Realty Times      Real Estate News and Advice  
August 21, 2006   
Classified Advice

Search Realty Times

Agent Marketing
Agent Toolbox
Contact Us
Preferred Vendors

The Real Estate Insider

You know delivers unmatched industry news and trends, but did you know it also offers a whole new world of business tools and marketing tips to help build your business? Register now for FREE access to members-only content and your chance to win a FREE laptop.

Today's Insider REALTOR Secret

Your Home. Made Simple.

Agent News > News
Attorney Wins Failure To Disclose Toxic Mold Case For Seller
by Blanche Evans

Four months after purchasing a condo from Kimberly Orlando and Nguyen Nguyen in Huntington Beach, California, the buyers filed a lawsuit against the sellers, their real estate agent, the homeowners association, the termite inspector and the home inspector. The plaintiffs alleged causes of action for negligence, fraud, breach of contract, and negligent misrepresentation against the sellers and sought over $250,000 in damages from the sellers. Others in the lawsuits had already settled, but Orlando and Nguyen decided to take their chances in court.

"The main reason my clients decided to take this to trial, is that the money was coming out of their pockets," explains Santa Ana, California defense attorney Kevin J. Gramling, an expert in toxic tort litigation. "All they had was content insurance. My clients did have liability insurance, but the main issue with the insurance carrier was that the allegations were of an intentional nature (fraud and misrepresentation), such that they denied coverage."

Gramling says he and his clients, facing $250,000 in damages, explored settlement early. "My clients were willing to pay up to $5,000 to plaintiffs if they could get dismissed. My counseling to them was that it would take at least $5,000 for us to answer the complaint and propound some basic discovery. They determined that it would be reasonable to try to settle the whole case for such an amount. When we were met with a $250,000 demand, the settlement discussions broke off quickly. Obviously, at the end of the day, with my client paying me over $50,000, had they been able to get out for $5,000, and not go through a year of litigation and a trial, they felt they would have been better off. Although they feel completely vindicated now."

Orlando and Nguyen insisted they did nothing wrong, and that's why they were willing to go to trial, but that didn't stop others from settling. According to Gramling, the plaintiffs got $50,000 from the HOA, $15,000 from the Realtor and broker, and $5,000 from the termite company. As they headed to court with the sellers, the plaintiffs' attorney said they would dismiss the suit if the defendants agreed not to pursue fees and costs.

"They knew it would be difficult to prove, and they thought we would walk away," says Gramling. "The clients were adamant that we are going to pursue costs and fees and try the case."

Escrow closed in November 2004, and the plaintiffs filed their suit in February 2005, claiming the defendants had painted over mold and water stains in the 1300-square-foot condo. In the interim, California experienced the heaviest rains in 100 years in the winter of 2004 and 2005. "They did get water intrusion into the garage and deck upstairs," admits Gramling, "but there was no evidence my clients knew about this."

He continues, "My clients were credible. All they did was prepare the house for sale by painting the kitchen, and not even the areas where the mold was found, in the wall under the sink. A friend painted the kitchen and testified she didn't see any staining or mold and their Realtor testified that she recommended that they paint the kitchen to prepare the home for sale, and there was no evidence to show mold."

There were other allegations, but the bottom line was that the Plaintiffs hired numerous experts including a general contractor and certified industrial hygienist to prove their case, but Mr. Gramling was able to refute the witnesses without calling any experts of his own, including HOA and property management company officials who stated that there were no other "rampant" mold claims by residents. The sellers had lived in the home just two and a half years before selling.

What Gramling said he was able to prove were myths about mold:

  • that just because mold is present doesn't mean it's toxic or letting off spores

  • that mold continues to cause long-term suffering once you get out of the mold environment

"We admit that mold can cause exacerbation of symptoms like runny nose and itchy eyes, but once out of that environment, you're fine. The plaintiffs were claiming that mold was found in two or three areas and that they needed to tear the home down and rebuild from the studs. The condo was 25 years old, a fact that didn't go unnoticed by the judge.

And that's where the plaintiffs may have overplayed their hand.

On June 29, 2006, a minute order was issued finding in favor of the defendants in the bench trial, but it's not over yet. The defendants have to file a memorandum of costs, and a motion for attorneys fees to recoup the nearly $60,000 in defense counsel fees and costs they've already paid.

So what's the lesson for sellers? "The takeaway is in California, the law is specific about what a seller needs to disclose. Disclose every conceivable problem you are aware of. It's expensive to take a case to trial where you must be prepared to incur at least $50,000. You could settle the thing for $5000 early on and get out."

The impact of this case could be far-reaching, says Gramling. "There are still too many myths about mold, and we expect these failure-to-disclose lawsuits to continue in the future."

Published: August 21, 2006

Related Articles:

  • Mold Found Where Least And Most Expected
  • Housing Counsel: Mold Was Remediated, Do I Still Disclose?
  • The Growth of Toxic Mold Liability and Its Targets: Part I

    Blanche Evans is the award-winning editor of Realty Times, the Internet's largest independent real estate news service, where she oversees the nation's leading real estate writers and columnists.

    Known for her keen insight on real estate industry issues and for her ability to make complex subjects easy to understand, Blanche is the author of two best-selling real estate books: The Hottest e-Careers In Real Estate, an Internet marketing primer for real estate professionals, and The Insider's Guide To Buying And Selling Your Home Using The Internet, a comprehensive homebuying and selling guide.

    In 2006, Blanche will have three new consumer books published, including:

    • Bubbles, Booms, and Busts: Make Money In Any Real Estate Market, McGraw-Hill

    • The NAR Guide to Home Buying, Wiley & Sons

    • The NAR Guide to Home Selling, Wiley & Sons

    In addition to authoring books and her duties at Realty Times, Blanche is sought out for her expert opinions by the nation's premier print and broadcast news organizations, including: CNN, The Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press. She's also in demand by real estate organizations -- from MLSs to real estate brokerage companies to large franchises -- who hire Blanche to address their groups and provide up-to-the-minute analysis of real estate industry happenings.

    2006 AE Institute Session - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    HouseValues Mastermind call - 1 2

    Blanche's fireside chat with Jeremy Conaway, HAR - Click here.

    Blanche has been named one of the "25 Most Influential People In Real Estate" by REALTOR Magazine, recognized as one of nine "Notables," and was named "Top Reporter Covering the NAR," (Delahaye-Bacon's, 2005)

    She can be reached at

    Copyright © 2006 Realty Times®. All Rights Reserved.

  • Blanche Evans
    Columnist Blanche Evans

    Realty Times Television
    Weekends on Satellite Television


    You know delivers unmatched industry news and trends, but did you know it also offers a whole new world of business tools and marketing tips to help build your business? Read about new program partners and the latest deals for NAR members.

    Agent News

  • Attorney Wins Failure To Disclose Toxic Mold Case For Seller

  • 1031 Exchanges Involving Your Personal Residence

  • The Power of Podcasting (PART II)

  • Affordability Worsens For First-time California Homebuyers

  • Rental Conversions and Pricing

  • Seller Wants To Know If Listing Agent's E & O Is A Come-on

    Your Home. Made Simple.

    Exclusive Leads In Your Market
    Agent Publicity | Local Market Conditions | News & Advice | About Realty Times
    Site Map | Article Index | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Contact Us | Credits